Fixed matches seller

Let's discuss the terms dogger and pseudodogger in the context of sports betting. Who are they, what they do and do they exist at all. You can find a lot of information on match fixing on the Internet, and we also recently discussed this issue in detail. Today we continue and supplement the topic.

Who is dogger in sports betting

Dogger is a player who bets on the outcomes of matches that have become known to him in advance. That is, the bettor knows for sure that the match will end with the victory of one of the teams, or even knows the exact score, some other nuances of the match, and bets on the desired outcomes at high odds. The more nuances a dogger knows, the higher the odds he can get.

Could this be? Oh sure. In the previous article on this topic, we have already decided that fixing matches are not uncommon, we gave examples of such matches. Including at the highest level of competition - the Olympics, World and European Football Championships, NHL, NBA and other prestigious sports leagues. Fixed matches are beneficial to all parties to the process, they can be organized by bookmakers, athletes / teams themselves, and gaming syndicates.

And if there are fixed matches themselves, then there is a certain layer of people who know about them. Accordingly, a dogger is a person who has become aware of the information about the match fixing, and he bets on it.

This may be some kind of one-time situation, for example:

1. An athlete friend shared his insider information over a bottle of beer;
2. The classified information at work in a sports club accidentally became known;
3. In the circle of sports journalism, some rumors were actively circulated.

Etc. But some people make money on dogs regularly. They themselves negotiate with athletes (most often single sports), or make acquaintances with scouts, team representatives, officials of sports federations.

The level of such agreements can be very different. From the godforsaken tennis challenger for players from the second thousand of the rating, to the largest football tournaments, on which you can put millions of dollars. The latter are most often organized by large syndicates of players. They recruit entire sports teams and make fortunes from their matches.

Will a dogger share his information with a wider circle of people?

This is the most interesting question. In our opinion, it is quite obvious that no. Firstly, in many countries, criminal liability is provided for such acts, and the risks of spreading such information are too great.

Secondly, bookmakers, suspecting something was wrong, can withdraw the match from the line, and all bets are calculated as a refund. Then the organizers will incur losses, because the organization of the fixing match cost them money, but they did not receive any profit. In addition, their account in the bookmaker office can be blocked together with the amount of the bet, and then the losses will increase many times over.

Bookmakers have already learned quite accurately to identify suspicious games by the volume of bets, the activity of bettors and other indirect signs. They immediately close accepting bets on such events, and already accepted bets are calculated as a refund.

In addition, in each country there are entire organizations working to identify and counteract match-fixing, often even at the state level. One of the most famous non-profit organizations working in this area is federbet.

On the other hand, depending on the scale of the competition and pre-match arrangements, bets on a contractual match can bring a player (or a group of doggers) millions of rubles.

Is it worth risking them and your own freedom to get an additional couple of tens of thousands of rubles on the sale of forecasts? The answer is obvious.

Who are pseudodoggers

But there are so many advertisements on the Internet about the sale of match fixing results, you might say. Yes, indeed, there are a lot of such ads. The problem is that there are not so many people in the world who have such information.

99.9% of these ads are outright fraudulent. Such people are called pseudodoggers. They do not really have any insider information, they just make money fraudulently, fooling the gullible public.

We leave the remaining 0.1% in case of an inexperienced dogger who was able to agree only for one match. He bet on it with a low limit and is now trying his best to get the most out of this deal by selling the result he knows online.

An experienced dogger will not take such risks for the relatively small additional income from a match. And in large syndicates, where dogs are put on stream in big competitions, no one would even think of doing such nonsense.

We have already considered ways of deceiving citizens by pseudodoggers in the last article:

1. Drawn statistics;
2. Guessing results;
3. Sending opposite results to groups of clients;
4. Archives with a secret;
5. Exposing other people's contracts and promoting "friends".

Some pseudo-doggers give their outcomes "after payment", but this looks even more ridiculous. That is, a group of people organized a negotiated match for a lot of money in order to make money on this. And now, he sends the result to everyone who wants to, in the hope that he will pay after the passage of the bet. It is difficult to say what level of development you need to have in order to get the agenda. But there are such people, because otherwise the scammers would not have been doing this.

How can you believe such a proposal?

It is much more logical to assume that such “informants” simply send out the results at random, so that someone will go. Or, if we talk about info-gypsies, they stimulate their audience to place bets on their forecast in the “necessary” bookmaker's office. In order to get then a rollback from their loss in the form of a certain percentage, sometimes reaching half of the sum of the players' minus.

There is another small layer, “conditionally honest” pseudo-doggers. They do not work at random, but try on their own to identify fixed matches on the Internet using various signals. Sometimes they even do it quite successfully. But they still deceive their clients, telling them that they have some kind of insider information and receive information inaccessible to mere mortals. That is, in fact, they are the same scammers.

Conclusion

In order not to be deceived by pseudodoggers, it is enough to remember one simple fact: real doggers do not share their private information with everyone. Moreover, for ridiculous amounts, like a thousand rubles. Although for a hundred thousand reliable information of this kind cannot be found on the Internet.

If doggers do share information, then only in very narrow circles of trusted people. Everything else that you see in huge quantities is attempts by pseudo-doggers to divorce for money, without the slightest benefit to you. Stop feeding the scammers, turn on your head and learn the correct betting with BetMAX.